<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evelina, or, the history of a young lady&#8217;s entrance into appreciationism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bibliographing.com/2009/11/16/evelina-or-the-history-of-a-young-ladys-entrance-into-appreciationism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bibliographing.com/2009/11/16/evelina-or-the-history-of-a-young-ladys-entrance-into-appreciationism/</link>
	<description>or, writing about books</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:34:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: nicole</title>
		<link>http://www.bibliographing.com/2009/11/16/evelina-or-the-history-of-a-young-ladys-entrance-into-appreciationism/comment-page-1/#comment-4700</link>
		<dc:creator>nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bibliographing.com/?p=2066#comment-4700</guid>
		<description>Well, you&#039;re not going to get a cold-hearted run at Austen this week, but I &lt;em&gt;have&lt;/em&gt; been thinking about reading one of the novels I haven&#039;t read and seeing how it strikes me nowadays. I think probably &lt;em&gt;Sense and Sensibility&lt;/em&gt; sometime in the near-distant future.

Also, I was expecting to get some flak for complaining about the letters today, but who knows, maybe I won&#039;t. You&#039;re right; it&#039;s really not an epistolary novel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you&#8217;re not going to get a cold-hearted run at Austen this week, but I <em>have</em> been thinking about reading one of the novels I haven&#8217;t read and seeing how it strikes me nowadays. I think probably <em>Sense and Sensibility</em> sometime in the near-distant future.</p>
<p>Also, I was expecting to get some flak for complaining about the letters today, but who knows, maybe I won&#8217;t. You&#8217;re right; it&#8217;s really not an epistolary novel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amateur Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.bibliographing.com/2009/11/16/evelina-or-the-history-of-a-young-ladys-entrance-into-appreciationism/comment-page-1/#comment-4691</link>
		<dc:creator>Amateur Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bibliographing.com/?p=2066#comment-4691</guid>
		<description>First, how nice that there&#039;s someone out there in litblogland who knows what I&#039;m talking about.  So appreciated.

Second, I&#039;m probably misusing the term, but this sort of reading against the grain seems productive to me.  I don&#039;t know how much fun it is for you!  But it makes me selfishly look forward to a really cold-hearted run at Austen.  I think I&#039;d learn something.

Third, like &lt;i&gt;The Ayrshire Legatees&lt;/i&gt;, this is a real London novel.  Odd how rare that once was.  Or maybe there were lots of them, but they aren&#039;t canonical, I don&#039;t know.

Fourth, you seem to have discovered the terrible secret of this classic epistolary novel - it&#039;s not really an epistolary novel!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, how nice that there&#8217;s someone out there in litblogland who knows what I&#8217;m talking about.  So appreciated.</p>
<p>Second, I&#8217;m probably misusing the term, but this sort of reading against the grain seems productive to me.  I don&#8217;t know how much fun it is for you!  But it makes me selfishly look forward to a really cold-hearted run at Austen.  I think I&#8217;d learn something.</p>
<p>Third, like <i>The Ayrshire Legatees</i>, this is a real London novel.  Odd how rare that once was.  Or maybe there were lots of them, but they aren&#8217;t canonical, I don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>Fourth, you seem to have discovered the terrible secret of this classic epistolary novel &#8211; it&#8217;s not really an epistolary novel!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

