<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Classics of the Past Decades</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bibliographing.com/2008/09/03/classics-of-the-past-decades/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bibliographing.com/2008/09/03/classics-of-the-past-decades/</link>
	<description>or, writing about books</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:34:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Holiday</title>
		<link>http://www.bibliographing.com/2008/09/03/classics-of-the-past-decades/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Holiday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 03:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeinbooks.wordpress.com/?p=249#comment-138</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think people give enough credit to how controversial seemingly innocent books like Of Mice and Men were at publication. Almost every book considered a classic was burned or banned at one time or another.

I think that makes American Psycho more likely a pick, not less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think people give enough credit to how controversial seemingly innocent books like Of Mice and Men were at publication. Almost every book considered a classic was burned or banned at one time or another.</p>
<p>I think that makes American Psycho more likely a pick, not less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicole</title>
		<link>http://www.bibliographing.com/2008/09/03/classics-of-the-past-decades/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 02:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeinbooks.wordpress.com/?p=249#comment-137</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s true, though they&#039;ve changed a lot since many other staples were written too. I was sort of thinking that &quot;The Rules of Attraction&quot; seemed very appropriate too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true, though they&#8217;ve changed a lot since many other staples were written too. I was sort of thinking that &#8220;The Rules of Attraction&#8221; seemed very appropriate too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amateur Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.bibliographing.com/2008/09/03/classics-of-the-past-decades/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Amateur Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 02:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeinbooks.wordpress.com/?p=249#comment-136</guid>
		<description>If &quot;American Psycho&quot; will be read in the high schools of the future, the high schools of the future will have changed a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If &#8220;American Psycho&#8221; will be read in the high schools of the future, the high schools of the future will have changed a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

